I was really pleased to read today that some women could appear in the Second XI of Sussex cricket club - particularly Sarah Taylor. The article is under a title with a quote from Mark Lane, who coaches England's women's cricket team stating that they could one day play the county game. My response is why not! I'm glad someone's finally saying this to start the discussion. I've long thought that there should be no reason for team sports to force segregation, surely all teams want the best players - irrespective of age, race or gender, if you're good enough why should being born the wrong sex get in the way?
I guess the major objection would be that it would reduce the relevance of the female only game - at a time when it's improving massively (and in another team sport - football, England's women have secured a large - though in my opinion not sufficient, pay rise). I don't think this should really be an issue, all that should matter is letting each person fulfil their potential and each team becoming the best they can be. The only people who will lose out should Sarah, or another woman play in the county game would be the one man they replaced from the team - someone who presumably the selectors feel isn't as good as them so obviously needs to improve their own game.
I don't think it would be easy for a woman to make the step up. You see the fastest female bowlers bowling in the high 70 miles per hour, where most male seam bowlers reach a minimum of 80, with the fastest getting into the 90s. I know from personal experience that going from facing 70mph bowling to 80mph is almost a completely different game. If she can do it though, there should be no problem, I for one am hoping that she does represent Sussex Second XI this year, then who knows.